Triple

T1096102
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Z boson E24274 entity
Predicate isItsOwnAntiparticle P5368 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Z boson, isItsOwnAntiparticle, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isItsOwnAntiparticle
Context triple: [Z boson, isItsOwnAntiparticle, true]
  • A. isOwnAntiparticle chosen
    Indicates that an entity is identical to its own antiparticle, meaning it serves simultaneously as both particle and antiparticle in that relationship.
  • B. hasChargeConjugation
    Indicates that one entity is the charge-conjugated counterpart (particle vs. antiparticle form) of another entity.
  • C. isBoson
    Indicates that the subject is a boson, i.e., a particle that follows Bose–Einstein statistics and typically mediates forces or can occupy the same quantum state as others.
  • D. hasWeakIsospin
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specified value of weak isospin, representing its charge under the weak nuclear interaction.
  • E. hasIsospin
    Indicates that one particle possesses a specific isospin value or quantum number in relation to another reference or classification framework.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4940542308190ac2a0b1f730b7cfc completed March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b99ffb3481908cd168b6c58e1c6d completed March 1, 2026, 10:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b7448c148190a3c9a4158ebd05b4 completed March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.