Triple

T10946385
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Standards Track PEPs E258606 entity
Predicate example P1259 FINISHED
Object PEP 484 E265441 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: PEP 484 | Statement: [Standards Track PEPs, example, PEP 484]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: PEP 484
Context triple: [Standards Track PEPs, example, PEP 484]
  • A. PEP 484 chosen
    PEP 484 is the Python Enhancement Proposal that introduced a standard for type hints in Python, forming the basis of the language’s static typing ecosystem.
  • B. PEP 585
    PEP 585 is a Python Enhancement Proposal that introduced built-in generic types (like list[int] and dict[str, int]) as a modern replacement for many typing module aliases.
  • C. PEP 634
    PEP 634 is the Python Enhancement Proposal that formally specifies the semantics of structural pattern matching introduced in Python 3.10.
  • D. PEP 695
    PEP 695 is a Python Enhancement Proposal that introduces a new, more concise syntax for type parameter declarations to improve the language’s support for generics and static typing.
  • E. PEP 622
    PEP 622 is a Python Enhancement Proposal that introduced the design for structural pattern matching syntax later adopted in Python 3.10.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa8769b4819082bfe5e61b9017f0 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d770eaaea08190b06e508600d8a305 completed April 9, 2026, 9:27 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e23c3c885081908edcece772b2e759 completed April 17, 2026, 1:57 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:23 p.m.