Triple

T1089683
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Supreme Court of India E24132 entity
Predicate includesChiefJusticeInStrength P23355 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Supreme Court of India, includesChiefJusticeInStrength, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesChiefJusticeInStrength
Context triple: [Supreme Court of India, includesChiefJusticeInStrength, true]
  • A. chiefJustice
    Indicates that one entity serves as the chief justice (the highest-ranking judicial officer) of another entity, such as a court or jurisdiction.
  • B. hasChiefJudge
    Indicates that an entity holds the role or position of chief judge for another entity (such as a court or judicial body).
  • C. relativeAuthorityToChiefJustice
    Indicates the degree or nature of authority that an entity holds in relation to the Chief Justice.
  • D. numberOfChiefJustices
    Indicates the total count of individuals who have held the position of chief justice for a given entity or jurisdiction.
  • E. chiefJusticeAtDecision
    Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49404428c819092dcc9632f5f7b8b completed March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b97f216881909e9b8943ce2078e4 completed March 1, 2026, 10:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b741b0cc8190be001a16a81f6d9e completed March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4b7bd3d50819091e6f1d2ffe4c7ee completed March 1, 2026, 10:03 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.