Triple
T10868752
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wade–Giles |
E256595
|
entity |
| Predicate | developer |
P73
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Thomas Francis Wade |
E417001
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Thomas Francis Wade | Statement: [Wade–Giles, developer, Thomas Francis Wade]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Thomas Francis Wade Context triple: [Wade–Giles, developer, Thomas Francis Wade]
-
A.
Thomas Francis Wade
chosen
Thomas Francis Wade was a 19th-century British diplomat and sinologist best known for developing the Wade–Giles system of romanizing Chinese.
-
B.
Thomas Wade
Thomas Wade was a 19th-century British diplomat and sinologist best known for co-developing the Wade–Giles system of romanizing Chinese.
-
C.
Charles Evans Whittaker
Charles Evans Whittaker was an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court who served from 1957 to 1962 after a rapid rise through the federal judiciary.
-
D.
Alfred Brown
Alfred Brown was an early settler and prominent local figure after whom Brown County in South Dakota was named.
-
E.
Thomas Holding
Thomas Holding was a British-born silent film and stage actor active in early 20th-century American cinema.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa83d1448190a66d93c32394d21f |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d75170665881909944f92c2cdbe7e6 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:12 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e154cc97f88190aef41d18b5ebe836 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 9:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:20 p.m.