Triple
T10867950
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011 |
E256572
|
entity |
| Predicate | votingSystemProposed |
P55526
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Alternative Vote |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Alternative Vote | Statement: [Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011, votingSystemProposed, Alternative Vote]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: votingSystemProposed Context triple: [Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011, votingSystemProposed, Alternative Vote]
-
A.
votingMethod
Indicates the procedure or system by which a vote is cast, collected, and counted in a decision-making or electoral process.
-
B.
introducedVotingSystemChange
Indicates that an entity initiated or implemented a modification to an existing voting system.
-
C.
proposesSystem
chosen
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward a particular system for consideration, adoption, or implementation by another entity.
-
D.
electionMethod
Indicates the process or system used to select a candidate or make a decision in an election.
-
E.
typeOfVoting
Indicates the specific method or system by which a vote is cast or recorded in a decision-making process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa83d1448190a66d93c32394d21f |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7516f9b08819096b9438878bf36c9 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d70d308dfc81908792f98cfb871392 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:20 p.m.