Triple
T10851747
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Assignment Expressions |
E256161
|
entity |
| Predicate | syntaxForm |
P25612
|
FINISHED |
| Object | NAME := expression |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: NAME := expression | Statement: [Assignment Expressions, syntaxForm, NAME := expression]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: syntaxForm Context triple: [Assignment Expressions, syntaxForm, NAME := expression]
-
A.
logicalForm
Indicates a relationship where an expression is associated with its structured, formal logical representation.
-
B.
syntaxStyle
chosen
Indicates the stylistic or structural conventions used in the form or arrangement of an expression, statement, or code.
-
C.
standardFormUsedIn
Indicates that a particular standard form is employed or applied within a given context, process, or system.
-
D.
standardFormulation
Indicates that something is expressed or represented in a conventional, officially accepted, or commonly used form or version.
-
E.
syntaxFamily
Indicates that two linguistic elements share a common syntactic type, pattern, or structural classification within a grammar system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa81a5d08190aa86689061d1ddd2 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d75117b76c8190b0fb216b1428c3c7 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 7:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d70d2b51448190bae748ed6c23edde |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:20 p.m.