Triple
T1084673
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pastor aeternus |
E24022
|
entity |
| Predicate | definesDogma |
P9866
|
FINISHED |
| Object | papal infallibility |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: papal infallibility | Statement: [Pastor aeternus, definesDogma, papal infallibility]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definesDogma Context triple: [Pastor aeternus, definesDogma, papal infallibility]
-
A.
isDefinedAsDogmaBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or declares another entity as dogma or authoritative doctrine.
-
B.
sharesDogmaWith
Indicates that two entities hold and adhere to the same set of core beliefs, doctrines, or ideological principles.
-
C.
dateOfDogmaticDefinition
Indicates the specific date on which a doctrine or teaching was formally and authoritatively defined as dogma.
-
D.
keyDoctrine
Indicates that something is a central or foundational doctrine within a belief system, organization, or theoretical framework.
-
E.
doctrineExplainedBy
Indicates that an explanation or interpretation is provided for a particular doctrine by a specified source or agent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49404428c819092dcc9632f5f7b8b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b9608bac819085196cc0f8fbb2e7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b7407914819092ed933a7316b450 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.