Triple
T10831091
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Winchester (UK Parliament constituency) |
E255618
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasContestedElections |
P8400
|
FINISHED |
| Object | general elections |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: general elections | Statement: [Winchester (UK Parliament constituency), hasContestedElections, general elections]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasContestedElections Context triple: [Winchester (UK Parliament constituency), hasContestedElections, general elections]
-
A.
hasOfficeContested
Indicates that an individual has been a candidate for a particular public office in an election.
-
B.
wasContestedIn
chosen
Indicates that an event, position, or decision was the subject of competition, dispute, or challenge within a particular context or proceeding.
-
C.
wasContestedBetween
Indicates that an event, position, or resource was the subject of competition or dispute involving two or more opposing parties.
-
D.
alsoContestedIn
Indicates that the same issue, claim, or matter is being disputed or challenged in another context, case, or proceeding as well.
-
E.
electionContests
Indicates that one election is in competition with, or formally challenges the outcome or validity of, another election.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa8081448190a9324184f2bd1c26 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d744222288819093258b452569acab |
completed | April 9, 2026, 6:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d70d25280c8190b648d7d1958b413a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:19 p.m.