Triple
T10828530
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Argeș County |
E255555
|
entity |
| Predicate | capital |
P234
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pitești |
E113270
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pitești | Statement: [Argeș County, capital, Pitești]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pitești Context triple: [Argeș County, capital, Pitești]
-
A.
Pitești
chosen
Pitești is a city in southern Romania, known as an important industrial and transportation hub and the capital of Argeș County.
-
B.
Băilești
Băilești is a town in southwestern Romania, in Dolj County, known as a local agricultural and commercial center.
-
C.
Ploiești
Ploiești is a major city in southern Romania historically known for its oil industry and strategic importance during World War II.
-
D.
Hârșova
Hârșova is a small town in southeastern Romania, situated on the right bank of the Danube River and known for its historical and archaeological significance.
-
E.
Râmnicu Vâlcea
Râmnicu Vâlcea is a city in south-central Romania, located on the Olt River and serving as the capital of Vâlcea County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa8081448190a9324184f2bd1c26 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d734d3eab88190b30a3025b6b2b0bc |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e49658b5a48190813dcf114d92be8e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:46 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:19 p.m.