Triple
T1082247
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constitutional Court of South Africa |
E23971
|
entity |
| Predicate | canInvalidate |
P23732
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Acts of Parliament |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Acts of Parliament | Statement: [Constitutional Court of South Africa, canInvalidate, Acts of Parliament]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canInvalidate Context triple: [Constitutional Court of South Africa, canInvalidate, Acts of Parliament]
-
A.
canEnforce
Indicates that one entity has the authority or capability to compel compliance with rules, decisions, or obligations upon another entity.
-
B.
canBeRevoked
Indicates that a previously granted status, permission, or agreement is subject to being withdrawn or canceled.
-
C.
canPass
Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to move through, cross, or successfully traverse another entity or barrier.
-
D.
canAuthorize
Indicates that one entity has the power or permission to grant approval or official permission for another entity to perform an action or access a resource.
-
E.
canElect
Indicates that one entity has the authority or ability to choose another entity for a position, role, or office through an election process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493f1ddf48190a99d54b00e99f8ce |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b95d35888190a20593a278175df7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b73f4310819086281f8ec67d1a32 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4b80f0fb08190a19a50e38ae8f16c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.