Triple

T10813747
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Baron Arklow E255169 entity
Predicate secondCreationStatus P95888 FINISHED
Object extinct LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: extinct | Statement: [Baron Arklow, secondCreationStatus, extinct]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: secondCreationStatus
Context triple: [Baron Arklow, secondCreationStatus, extinct]
  • A. secondCreatedBy
    Indicates that an entity was created by a second or subsequent creator, distinguishing this creator from the primary or original one.
  • B. secondCreationYear
    Indicates the year in which an entity was created for the second time, such as after being recreated, relaunched, or re-established.
  • C. statusOfFirstCreation
    Indicates the condition or state associated with an entity’s initial act of creation or first-time establishment.
  • D. secondCreationFirstHolder
    Indicates that the first entity is the original holder or owner of the second entity at the time of its creation.
  • E. secondaryState
    Indicates that an entity is in a subordinate or less primary condition, status, or mode relative to its main or primary state.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa8081448190a9324184f2bd1c26 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d733eba9b48190b4dbe7fe5d8be0a4 completed April 9, 2026, 5:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d70d1bf3648190b36fa96ea018e0dc completed April 9, 2026, 2:21 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d7101c96708190808fef73199e8482 completed April 9, 2026, 2:34 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:18 p.m.