Triple

T10811543
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Alexander Sebastian E255111 entity
Predicate relationshipToAliciaHuberman P95580 FINISHED
Object husband LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: husband | Statement: [Alexander Sebastian, relationshipToAliciaHuberman, husband]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToAliciaHuberman
Context triple: [Alexander Sebastian, relationshipToAliciaHuberman, husband]
  • A. relationshipTypeWith Alicia Johns
    Indicates the specific type or nature of the relationship that an entity has with Alicia Johns.
  • B. relationshipToJoannaKramer
    Indicates the specific familial, social, or interpersonal connection that one entity has to Joanna Kramer.
  • C. relationshipToEmmaGoldman
    Indicates the specific type of personal, professional, or ideological relationship an entity has to Emma Goldman.
  • D. relationshipWithHumbertHumbert
    Indicates that an entity has a specified type of personal, emotional, or social relationship with Humbert Humbert.
  • E. associationWithHumans
    Indicates a general relationship, connection, or involvement between an entity and one or more humans.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa61c15c8190a1839550c56e75e1 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d733b7bfac8190b6ae34144376d6ad completed April 9, 2026, 5:05 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6f3188f00819094ee8d65b187a333 completed April 9, 2026, 12:30 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d6fa334b8c819082eaf8537084c323 completed April 9, 2026, 1 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:18 p.m.