Triple
T10790789
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John W. Young |
E254571
|
entity |
| Predicate | roleInGemini3 |
P95494
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pilot |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pilot | Statement: [John W. Young, roleInGemini3, Pilot]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInGemini3 Context triple: [John W. Young, roleInGemini3, Pilot]
-
A.
roleInText
Indicates that an entity participates in a text with a specific function or capacity (e.g., author, editor, character).
-
B.
roleInDialogue
Indicates that an entity participates in a dialogue with a specific conversational role (e.g., speaker, listener, moderator) relative to other participants.
-
C.
roleInEngine
Indicates the specific function or responsibility an entity has within an engine or engine-like system.
-
D.
roleInVox
Indicates that an entity holds a specific role or function within a Vox-related context, such as a project, system, or organization named or described as "Vox."
-
E.
roleInIntegration
Indicates the specific function or responsibility an entity has within a combined or coordinated system, process, or integration.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa609f008190a294200aefcb7bd5 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d732f5b8248190a633dc44ae620a3a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6f316940c819092a96c429629fdef |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:30 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d6fa334b8c819082eaf8537084c323 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:17 p.m.