Triple
T1077104
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IPsec |
E23863
|
entity |
| Predicate | isMandatoryFor |
P23639
|
FINISHED |
| Object | IPv6 implementation (original specification) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: IPv6 implementation (original specification) | Statement: [IPsec, isMandatoryFor, IPv6 implementation (original specification)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isMandatoryFor Context triple: [IPsec, isMandatoryFor, IPv6 implementation (original specification)]
-
A.
isNotRequiredFor
Indicates that one entity is not necessary or mandatory for the existence, occurrence, validity, or completion of another entity or process.
-
B.
requiredBy
Indicates that one entity depends on or cannot function properly without another entity being present, completed, or satisfied.
-
C.
hasMandate
Indicates that an entity is officially authorized or required to perform a specific role, action, or set of responsibilities.
-
D.
obligationCondition
Indicates that one situation or state serves as the condition under which an obligation for an entity becomes active or must be fulfilled.
-
E.
hasMandatoryJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one entity holds legally required authority to hear and decide cases involving another entity, without discretion to decline jurisdiction.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493f1ddf48190a99d54b00e99f8ce |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b94288d88190aae4fb86236c0702 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b73ba8208190be7f3cef8c18689b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4b80f0fb08190a19a50e38ae8f16c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.