Triple

T1072878
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tarnów E23368 entity
Predicate hasMinorityHeritage P1494 FINISHED
Object Jewish heritage LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jewish heritage | Statement: [Tarnów, hasMinorityHeritage, Jewish heritage]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMinorityHeritage
Context triple: [Tarnów, hasMinorityHeritage, Jewish heritage]
  • A. hasMinorityIn
    Indicates that one entity holds a non-controlling, minority ownership or stake in another entity.
  • B. recognizedAsMinorityIn
    Indicates that an entity is officially acknowledged or classified as belonging to a minority group within a specified context or jurisdiction.
  • C. hasHeritage chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular cultural, ethnic, or ancestral background.
  • D. hasSignificantPopulationGroup
    Indicates that an entity contains or is associated with a notable or substantial subgroup of a population, distinguished by shared characteristics or attributes.
  • E. notableMinorityIn
    Indicates that an entity is a prominent or significant member of a minority group within a specified larger group, place, or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493ee1f908190992b5f0d1b04459b completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b92afad88190b7705923f71fc760 completed March 1, 2026, 10:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b73844708190a16c9e9824ca2fb6 completed March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.