Triple
T10695421
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Spider-Man (2002 film) |
E252125
|
entity |
| Predicate | producer |
P490
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ian Bryce |
E252125
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ian Bryce | Statement: [Spider-Man (2002 film), producer, Ian Bryce]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ian Bryce Context triple: [Spider-Man (2002 film), producer, Ian Bryce]
-
A.
Ian Bryce
chosen
Ian Bryce is a British film producer known for his work on major Hollywood blockbusters such as Saving Private Ryan and the Transformers series.
-
B.
Ian Meakins
Ian Meakins is a British business executive known for leading major multinational companies, including serving as chairman of Unilever.
-
C.
Ian Crafford
Ian Crafford is a film editor best known for his work on the James Bond movie "Never Say Never Again."
-
D.
Andrew Rennison
Andrew Rennison is a British public official known for serving as the inaugural Surveillance Camera Commissioner, overseeing the regulation and ethical use of CCTV and related surveillance technologies in the UK.
-
E.
Ian Mackley
Ian Mackley is the husband of British comedian and television personality Julian Clary.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5bd7c08190a816e733b4045c23 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6fd3af5248190ab807965255e9ad2 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1:13 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e3e6afdf0c8190924cb14512a89ee8 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 8:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:11 p.m.