Triple

T106897
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Green Light E2157 entity
Predicate hasInstrumentation P1149 FINISHED
Object synthesizers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: synthesizers | Statement: [Green Light, hasInstrumentation, synthesizers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInstrumentation
Context triple: [Green Light, hasInstrumentation, synthesizers]
  • A. usesInstrument
    Indicates that an agent performs an action by employing a specific instrument or tool as the means to carry it out.
  • B. typicalInstrumentation chosen
    Indicates the usual or standard set of instruments commonly associated with performing or realizing something (such as a work, genre, or piece).
  • C. hasFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or includes a particular characteristic, attribute, or component.
  • D. hasNotableImplementationAt
    Indicates that something has a significant or noteworthy implementation located at or associated with a particular place, context, or platform.
  • E. hasSupported
    Indicates that one entity has provided assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity, either materially, emotionally, or through advocacy.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24e0a5b7c81908d52da08c60dabc4 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a256ec650c8190bee2067e37065527 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2563d33788190999d471b486d5603 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:12 a.m.