Triple

T10669762
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Second Battle of Newbury E251454 entity
Predicate tacticalCharacter P81531 FINISHED
Object hard-fought LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hard-fought | Statement: [Second Battle of Newbury, tacticalCharacter, hard-fought]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tacticalCharacter
Context triple: [Second Battle of Newbury, tacticalCharacter, hard-fought]
  • A. tacticalStyle
    Indicates the characteristic way in which an entity plans and executes actions or maneuvers to achieve its objectives.
  • B. tacticalPurpose
    Indicates the specific tactical objective or intended operational role that an action, asset, or decision is meant to achieve within a broader plan or mission.
  • C. associatedWithTacticalAcuity chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, characterized by, or demonstrates tactical acuity in planning or executing actions.
  • D. targetsCharacter
    Indicates that one entity is the intended focus or target of another entity’s action, effect, or behavior.
  • E. militaryCharacteristic
    Indicates that one entity possesses a specific military-related attribute, quality, or feature in relation to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5b0d2881909584b20efc5877f0 completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6f861513881909b44c711371086b7 completed April 9, 2026, 12:52 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6dd8a93208190a573061387e2aebb completed April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:09 p.m.