Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Bowsher v. Synar (1986) | Statement: [Gramm–Rudman–Hollings Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, partiallyInvalidatedInCase, Bowsher v. Synar (1986)]

Target entity: Bowsher v. Synar (1986)
Context triple: [Gramm–Rudman–Hollings Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, partiallyInvalidatedInCase, Bowsher v. Synar (1986)]

• A. Bowsher v. Synar chosen
  Bowsher v. Synar is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited congressional control over executive functions by ruling that Congress could not retain removal power over an official charged with executing federal budget cuts.
• B. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
  New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the “actual malice” standard, greatly expanding First Amendment protections for the press in defamation cases involving public officials.
• C. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
  FCC v. Pacifica Foundation is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the government's authority to regulate indecent material on public airwaves, stemming from a radio broadcast of George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" monologue.
• D. Meredith v. Fair
  Meredith v. Fair was a landmark federal court case that paved the way for James Meredith’s historic 1962 enrollment as the first Black student at the University of Mississippi, challenging entrenched racial segregation in higher education.
• E. Griffin v. California
  Griffin v. California is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that prosecutors and judges may not comment on a criminal defendant’s failure to testify, as this violates the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: partiallyInvalidatedInCase
Context triple: [Gramm–Rudman–Hollings Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, partiallyInvalidatedInCase, Bowsher v. Synar (1986)]

• A. partiallyInvalidatedBy chosen
  Indicates that the validity or effect of something is reduced or weakened, but not completely nullified, by another action or entity.
• B. partiallyPreserved
  Indicates that the referenced entity or object is only incompletely intact, with some parts missing, damaged, or lost while others remain.
• C. isPartially
  Indicates that one entity is included within another to some extent, but not completely or fully.
• D. reopenedPartially
  Indicates that an entity that was previously closed or inactive has been opened again, but only to a limited or incomplete extent.
• E. partiallyRestored
  Indicates that an entity has been brought back toward a previous or original state, but the restoration is incomplete or only partially achieved.
• F. None of above.