Triple
T106062
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of Japan |
E2138
|
entity |
| Predicate | reviewsConstitutionalityOf |
P1122
|
FINISHED |
| Object | laws |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: laws | Statement: [Supreme Court of Japan, reviewsConstitutionalityOf, laws]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reviewsConstitutionalityOf Context triple: [Supreme Court of Japan, reviewsConstitutionalityOf, laws]
-
A.
constitutionalChallenge
chosen
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
B.
constitutionalNumber
Indicates that an entity has a specific number or count defined or constrained by a constitution or foundational governing document.
-
C.
constitutionalContext
Indicates that something occurs, is interpreted, or is evaluated within the framework, principles, or provisions of a constitution.
-
D.
constitutionalCategory
Indicates the classification of something according to its constitutional or structural type or category.
-
E.
constitutionalCitation
Indicates a relationship where one entity cites, references, or is grounded in a specific provision or article of a constitution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24e0a5b7c81908d52da08c60dabc4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a256ec650c8190bee2067e37065527 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2563d33788190999d471b486d5603 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:12 a.m.