Triple
T10601367
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mazon River |
E275754
|
entity |
| Predicate | near |
P350
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Coal City, Illinois |
E214616
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Coal City, Illinois | Statement: [Mazon River, near, Coal City, Illinois]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Coal City, Illinois Context triple: [Mazon River, near, Coal City, Illinois]
-
A.
Coal City, Illinois
chosen
Coal City, Illinois is a small village in northeastern Illinois known historically for its coal mining roots and close-knit community.
-
B.
Coal City, Indiana
Coal City, Indiana is a small unincorporated community in southwestern Indiana historically associated with coal mining and rural life.
-
C.
Newark, Illinois
Newark, Illinois is a small rural village in northern Illinois known for its agricultural surroundings and close-knit community.
-
D.
Elwood, Illinois
Elwood, Illinois is a small village in northeastern Illinois known for its rural character and proximity to major transportation and logistics hubs.
-
E.
Ludlow, Illinois
Ludlow, Illinois is a small village in east-central Illinois located within the rural agricultural region of Champaign County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aaf948d88190806cc3a8c47a3fb2 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6ded52f288190b40288d0acbe009b |
completed | April 8, 2026, 11:03 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d95ea8f1688190aa36e29b52667d26 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 7:31 p.m.