Triple
T105627
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Emperor of Japan |
E2130
|
entity |
| Predicate | nativeLabelLanguage |
P151
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Japanese |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Japanese | Statement: [Emperor of Japan, nativeLabelLanguage, Japanese]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: nativeLabelLanguage Context triple: [Emperor of Japan, nativeLabelLanguage, Japanese]
-
A.
nativeLabel
Indicates the label or name of an entity expressed in its own native or original language.
-
B.
nativeLanguage
chosen
Indicates the language that a person or entity originally learned and uses as their primary or first language.
-
C.
primaryLanguageOf
Indicates that a specified language is the main or official language used by a particular entity (such as a person, organization, or region).
-
D.
recognizedRegionalLanguage
Indicates that a language holds officially recognized status within a specific region or subnational jurisdiction.
-
E.
recognizedLanguage
Indicates that an entity has identified, detected, or acknowledged a particular language as being used or present.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24e0a5b7c81908d52da08c60dabc4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a256ec650c8190bee2067e37065527 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2563d33788190999d471b486d5603 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:12 a.m.