Triple
T1055807
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Big Poppa |
E22797
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWithEthnicity |
P194
|
FINISHED |
| Object | African-American culture |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: African-American culture | Statement: [Big Poppa, associatedWithEthnicity, African-American culture]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithEthnicity Context triple: [Big Poppa, associatedWithEthnicity, African-American culture]
-
A.
relatedEthnicGroup
Indicates that there is a notable ethnic connection or association between two ethnic groups, such as shared ancestry, culture, or historical ties.
-
B.
involvedEthnicGroup
Indicates that a particular ethnic group participates in, is affected by, or is otherwise associated with the referenced event, situation, or entity.
-
C.
affectedEthnicGroup
Indicates that a particular ethnic group is impacted or influenced by an event, condition, policy, or action.
-
D.
otherEthnicGroup
Indicates that one entity belongs to a different ethnic group than the other entity.
-
E.
ethnicOrigin
chosen
Indicates the relationship where an entity is associated with a particular ethnic group or ancestry.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493da02e081908c13ff5e02a0fe7a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b8d9102c819090af78cae50f0ff2 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b731e25c8190b5ea8466648c2c9a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.