Triple
T10537299
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jeff Fenech |
E248601
|
entity |
| Predicate | madeComeback |
P94430
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2008 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2008 | Statement: [Jeff Fenech, madeComeback, 2008]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: madeComeback Context triple: [Jeff Fenech, madeComeback, 2008]
-
A.
comebackSingleFor
Indicates that a particular single serves as a comeback release for an artist or group, marking their return after a hiatus or previous work.
-
B.
comebackAlbumFor
Indicates that one album serves as an artist’s return or resurgence release following a period of inactivity, decline, or absence.
-
C.
comebackContext
Indicates the situational background, circumstances, or prior events that frame or motivate a comeback or return.
-
D.
comebackWorkFor
Indicates that an entity returns to a previous workplace or employer to work again.
-
E.
inningOfKeyComeback
Indicates the specific inning during which a pivotal comeback in the game occurred.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c5c7448190bec34bee7ec72bac |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d50a554fb4819081e9618bab051dc6 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 1:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4fb9729288190a0149f127acd7ae3 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:41 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d4fe06d4a48190b1a45dd1d4e16df0 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:31 p.m.