Triple

T10500404
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Yorkshire County Fish Shop E247655 entity
Predicate targetGuests P34539 FINISHED
Object EPCOT visitors LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: EPCOT visitors | Statement: [Yorkshire County Fish Shop, targetGuests, EPCOT visitors]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: targetGuests
Context triple: [Yorkshire County Fish Shop, targetGuests, EPCOT visitors]
  • A. relationshipWithGuests
    Indicates the nature or status of the connection or interaction that someone has with their guests.
  • B. supportsGuest
    Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or accommodation to another entity in the role of a guest.
  • C. guestCountApproximate
    Indicates that the number of guests involved is represented as an estimated or approximate count rather than an exact figure.
  • D. returnsAsGuestIn
    Indicates that an entity comes back to participate or appear again in a context, but specifically in the role or capacity of a guest rather than a regular or primary member.
  • E. primaryVisitors chosen
    Indicates that certain entities are the main or most important visitors associated with another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381c309b88190af78aa681cf6a4c2 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d5098ef57c8190a9803c2c1736d299 completed April 7, 2026, 1:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4fb8e24ac8190912c9f11b8bd3084 completed April 7, 2026, 12:41 p.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:25 p.m.