Triple

T10480903
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tyari dialect E247164 entity
Predicate languageCodeScope P68948 FINISHED
Object covered under Assyrian Neo‑Aramaic (aii) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: covered under Assyrian Neo‑Aramaic (aii) | Statement: [Tyari dialect, languageCodeScope, covered under Assyrian Neo‑Aramaic (aii)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageCodeScope
Context triple: [Tyari dialect, languageCodeScope, covered under Assyrian Neo‑Aramaic (aii)]
  • A. hasLanguageCodeScope chosen
    Indicates that a language code is valid or applicable only within a specified scope, context, or domain.
  • B. linguisticScope
    Indicates the range or domain within language (such as a phrase, clause, or discourse segment) over which a particular linguistic element, feature, or operation has effect.
  • C. languageCodeRelation
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is associated with, identified by, or mapped to a specific language code of another entity.
  • D. languageCodeISO639-1
    Indicates that the subject entity is associated with the specified two-letter ISO 639-1 language code.
  • E. languageCodeStandard
    Indicates that a language code conforms to a specific standardized coding scheme (such as ISO language code standards).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381c309b88190af78aa681cf6a4c2 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d5095c5dc88190902582db28df01b4 completed April 7, 2026, 1:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4fb8a30848190b33cf43f005a028e completed April 7, 2026, 12:41 p.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:22 p.m.