Triple
T1047582
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Royal Standard of Norway |
E22616
|
entity |
| Predicate | chargeTincture |
P24010
|
FINISHED |
| Object | or |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: or | Statement: [Royal Standard of Norway, chargeTincture, or]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: chargeTincture Context triple: [Royal Standard of Norway, chargeTincture, or]
-
A.
charge
Indicates that one entity formally accuses another of an offense or imposes a financial cost or obligation on them.
-
B.
chargesVia
Indicates that one entity charges or powers another entity using a specified medium, method, or interface.
-
C.
centralCharge
Indicates that an entity has a specific central charge value, typically quantifying a key parameter in a conformal or related physical or mathematical theory.
-
D.
colorCharge
Indicates a relationship where an entity possesses a specific quantum color charge (such as red, green, or blue) in the context of strong nuclear interactions.
-
E.
hasCharge
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific electrical or formal charge, such as positive, negative, or neutral.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493da02e081908c13ff5e02a0fe7a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b8f28c7c8190b9ca3749666bcbf3 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b72e3e488190b768005ad647886b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4b8f1097881908932d7eea4331917 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.