Triple
T10446428
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lawrance |
E246299
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAssociatedMeaning |
P4340
|
FINISHED |
| Object | crowned with laurel |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: crowned with laurel | Statement: [Lawrance, hasAssociatedMeaning, crowned with laurel]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAssociatedMeaning Context triple: [Lawrance, hasAssociatedMeaning, crowned with laurel]
-
A.
hasMeaningViaJohn
Indicates that something possesses or conveys its meaning specifically through John as the interpretive or mediating agent.
-
B.
hasLiteralMeaning
Indicates that one entity expresses the direct, explicit meaning or sense of another entity (such as a word, phrase, or symbol).
-
C.
possibleMeaning
Indicates that something may plausibly represent, signify, or be interpreted as a particular meaning or sense.
-
D.
hasMean
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular mean value or average.
-
E.
hasConnotation
chosen
Indicates that one entity carries an implied or associated meaning, tone, or emotional nuance in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c04fe08190957c26c526a3b05a |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4fe083cd881909d2d8ad75d1d94cb |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4fb73a5e48190a8df4775bc5da80f |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:16 p.m.