Triple

T10444930
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Olivia Wenscombe E246261 entity
Predicate relationshipTypeWithAlfredBorden P10690 FINISHED
Object romantic relationship LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic relationship | Statement: [Olivia Wenscombe, relationshipTypeWithAlfredBorden, romantic relationship]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWithAlfredBorden
Context triple: [Olivia Wenscombe, relationshipTypeWithAlfredBorden, romantic relationship]
  • A. relationshipTypeWith Alicia Johns
    Indicates the specific type or nature of the relationship that an entity has with Alicia Johns.
  • B. historicalRelationship
    Indicates a relationship that existed between entities in the past, often tied to a specific historical period, context, or event.
  • C. relationshipToCatherine
    Indicates the specific familial, social, or interpersonal connection that one entity has to the person named Catherine.
  • D. relationshipToHenry
    Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Henry.
  • E. relationshipType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381c04fe08190957c26c526a3b05a completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4fe083cd881909d2d8ad75d1d94cb completed April 7, 2026, 12:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4fb73a5e48190a8df4775bc5da80f completed April 7, 2026, 12:41 p.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:16 p.m.