Triple

T1044488
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sierra de las Cruces E22544 entity
Predicate hasProtectedAreas P855 FINISHED
Object local conservation areas LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: local conservation areas | Statement: [Sierra de las Cruces, hasProtectedAreas, local conservation areas]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProtectedAreas
Context triple: [Sierra de las Cruces, hasProtectedAreas, local conservation areas]
  • A. hasProtectedArea chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a designated protected area for conservation or restricted use.
  • B. hasProtectedAreaStatus
    Indicates that an area is officially designated and managed as a protected area under relevant conservation or legal frameworks.
  • C. hasMajorSanctuary
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a primary or principal sanctuary location.
  • D. partOfProtectedAreaCategory
    Indicates that one protected area belongs to, or is classified under, a specific protected area category.
  • E. protectedAreaEstablished
    Indicates that a designated protected area has been formally created or brought into legal existence.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493d91478819094cc01fb65564bc1 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b84937688190a5899af2104002df completed March 1, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b72ba60881908b017ef3b2b9645e completed March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.