Triple

T10442113
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hof district E246193 entity
Predicate hasRiver P165 FINISHED
Object Eger E754423 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Eger | Statement: [Hof district, hasRiver, Eger]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Eger
Context triple: [Hof district, hasRiver, Eger]
  • A. Eger
    Eger is a historic city in northern Hungary known for its baroque architecture, castle, and wine culture.
  • B. Eger chosen
    Eger is the former German name for the Czech town of Cheb, a historic settlement near the German border in western Bohemia.
  • C. Fehérgyarmat
    Fehérgyarmat is a small town in eastern Hungary known for its rural character and location near the Ukrainian and Romanian borders.
  • D. Sátoraljaújhely
    Sátoraljaújhely is a historic town in northeastern Hungary near the Slovak border, known for its wine region, cultural heritage, and scenic Zemplén Mountains setting.
  • E. Zalaegerszeg
    Zalaegerszeg is a city in western Hungary that serves as the administrative center of Zala County and a regional economic and cultural hub.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381c04fe08190957c26c526a3b05a completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4fb9ebf488190ae776bd65e94cb00 completed April 7, 2026, 12:42 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d87ed6edd88190afd5063daba58a46 completed April 10, 2026, 4:38 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:15 p.m.