Triple

T10414139
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Smithsonian Agreement E245472 entity
Predicate fluctuationBandWidth P94020 FINISHED
Object ±2.25% LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ±2.25% | Statement: [Smithsonian Agreement, fluctuationBandWidth, ±2.25%]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fluctuationBandWidth
Context triple: [Smithsonian Agreement, fluctuationBandWidth, ±2.25%]
  • A. upperBandWidth
    Indicates the maximum bandwidth limit or upper threshold of data transfer capacity allowed or supported in a given context.
  • B. flowVariation
    Indicates how the rate or pattern of flow (such as water, traffic, or data) changes over time or across different conditions.
  • C. numberOfFrequencyBands
    Indicates the relationship specifying how many distinct frequency bands are associated with or used by an entity.
  • D. hasGainBandwidthProductTypical
    Indicates that an entity has a specified typical value for its gain–bandwidth product, describing the standard frequency–gain performance characteristic.
  • E. frequencyBand
    Indicates the specific range of frequencies within which a signal, measurement, or phenomenon is defined or operates.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381be340c8190b05998703d42d224 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4ea0ec6fc8190a71af759226a3cba completed April 7, 2026, 11:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4dfb6f160819090040644a12395ec completed April 7, 2026, 10:43 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d4e91ce2008190af252c140370b7f2 completed April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:10 p.m.