Triple

T1040490
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ossetian language E22457 entity
Predicate laterWrittenIn P23830 FINISHED
Object Latin script LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Latin script | Statement: [Ossetian language, laterWrittenIn, Latin script]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterWrittenIn
Context triple: [Ossetian language, laterWrittenIn, Latin script]
  • A. writtenIn
    Indicates that a work (such as a text, program, or document) is expressed or encoded using a particular language or notation.
  • B. wroteIn
    Indicates that an entity authored or composed something using a particular language, medium, or writing system.
  • C. areWrittenOn
    Indicates that one entity serves as a surface or medium on which another entity is inscribed, recorded, or written.
  • D. writtenDuring
    Indicates that the creation or authorship of something took place within a specified time period or historical event.
  • E. likelyWrittenFrom
    Indicates that something (such as a text, statement, or perspective) is probably authored or expressed from the viewpoint, context, or position of a particular entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493d91478819094cc01fb65564bc1 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b845fa8c8190a7b69629883b62e2 completed March 1, 2026, 10:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b72ba60881908b017ef3b2b9645e completed March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4b8444f708190815732408aa0463e completed March 1, 2026, 10:05 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.