Triple
T10388658
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Seiberg–Witten theory |
E244833
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | quantum field theory framework |
C5732
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: quantum field theory framework Context triple: [Seiberg–Witten theory, instanceOf, quantum field theory framework]
-
A.
relativistic quantum field theory Lagrangian
A relativistic quantum field theory Lagrangian is a function of fields and their spacetime derivatives that encodes the dynamics, symmetries, and interactions of quantum fields in a Lorentz-invariant way.
-
B.
problem in field theory
A problem in field theory is a conceptual or computational question involving the properties, structures, and interactions of fields—such as scalar, vector, or gauge fields—typically formulated within the framework of classical or quantum field theory.
-
C.
fermionic field
A fermionic field is a quantum field whose excitations correspond to particles with half-integer spin that obey Fermi–Dirac statistics and the Pauli exclusion principle.
-
D.
regularization scheme in quantum field theory
A regularization scheme in quantum field theory is a systematic procedure for modifying divergent integrals or sums—typically by introducing an auxiliary parameter or cutoff—so that they become finite and mathematically well-defined while preserving as much of the theory’s symmetry and structure as possible.
-
E.
quantum theory formalism
chosen
A quantum theory formalism is a mathematical framework that specifies the states, observables, and dynamical laws governing quantum systems, enabling the prediction of measurement outcomes and their probabilities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381b5116081908d85227bab6d3c0c |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:05 p.m.