Triple
T1036593
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vivienne Haigh-Wood Eliot |
E22376
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToTSEliot |
P10690
|
FINISHED |
| Object | first wife |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: first wife | Statement: [Vivienne Haigh-Wood Eliot, relationshipToTSEliot, first wife]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToTSEliot Context triple: [Vivienne Haigh-Wood Eliot, relationshipToTSEliot, first wife]
-
A.
relationshipToAuntEller
Indicates the specific familial relationship that an entity has to Aunt Eller (e.g., whether and how they are related to her).
-
B.
relationToProvidence
Indicates a relationship or connection that something or someone has to Providence, such as origin, location, affiliation, or relevance.
-
C.
relationshipToHumans
Indicates the nature or type of connection, association, or relevance that something has specifically with humans.
-
D.
relationshipToSocrates
Indicates the specific familial, social, or conceptual connection that one entity has to Socrates.
-
E.
relationshipType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493d848848190aed4011b34b2e8d3 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b97c64a88190bf1119fdd4940bf3 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b729f8488190b2042bd9c625a833 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.