Triple

T10344839
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Danny Escobedo E243717 entity
Predicate participantIn P149 FINISHED
Object Escobedo v. Illinois E46482 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Escobedo v. Illinois | Statement: [Danny Escobedo, participantIn, Escobedo v. Illinois]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Escobedo v. Illinois
Context triple: [Danny Escobedo, participantIn, Escobedo v. Illinois]
  • A. Escobedo v. Illinois chosen
    Escobedo v. Illinois is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the Sixth Amendment right to counsel during police interrogations and helped lay the groundwork for the later Miranda warnings.
  • B. Moore v. Illinois
    Moore v. Illinois is a United States Supreme Court decision addressing constitutional criminal procedure issues, particularly concerning the rights of defendants in state prosecutions.
  • C. Brown v. Illinois
    Brown v. Illinois is a 1975 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the admissibility of confessions obtained after an unlawful arrest by emphasizing the need to purge the taint of the initial Fourth Amendment violation.
  • D. Illinois v. Wardlow
    Illinois v. Wardlow is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held an individual's unprovoked flight in a high-crime area can contribute to reasonable suspicion justifying a stop under the Fourth Amendment.
  • E. Illinois v. Krull
    Illinois v. Krull is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained by police relying on a statute later found unconstitutional.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381b22b8c8190aaed476be5f872a9 completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4e9228cd88190bcd94b85537233c1 completed April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d7507f708c8190b8cf684704a6e47d completed April 9, 2026, 7:08 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:56 a.m.