Triple

T10292391
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ad26.COV2.S E241393 entity
Predicate EMAStatus P92939 FINISHED
Object Conditional marketing authorization granted LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Conditional marketing authorization granted | Statement: [Ad26.COV2.S, EMAStatus, Conditional marketing authorization granted]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: EMAStatus
Context triple: [Ad26.COV2.S, EMAStatus, Conditional marketing authorization granted]
  • A. maintenanceStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of an entity with respect to its maintenance activities, such as whether it is pending, in progress, completed, or overdue.
  • B. hasEquipmentStatus
    Indicates the current operational or condition state assigned to a piece of equipment.
  • C. operatorStatus
    Indicates the current operational state or condition of an operator (e.g., active, inactive, or in error).
  • D. statusModel
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular status representation or status-handling model.
  • E. emblemStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of an emblem, such as whether it is active, valid, displayed, or in use.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381aaafc08190af475ef58dc16aba completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4d2d35f048190a215493acdf1f718 completed April 7, 2026, 9:48 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4d1f35e548190be3b4d92d65d2d20 completed April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d4d29d7cf08190acd70cee634c5cdb completed April 7, 2026, 9:47 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:42 a.m.