Triple
T10289727
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Morocco |
E241329
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalRecognitionOfAmazigh |
P58382
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2011 constitution |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2011 constitution | Statement: [Morocco, legalRecognitionOfAmazigh, 2011 constitution]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalRecognitionOfAmazigh Context triple: [Morocco, legalRecognitionOfAmazigh, 2011 constitution]
-
A.
legalRecognition
Indicates that an authority formally acknowledges the validity, status, or rights associated with an entity, relationship, or action under the law.
-
B.
legalStatusInAlgeria
Indicates the legal status or standing that an entity holds under the laws and regulations of Algeria.
-
C.
statusOfAzawadClaim
Indicates the current state or condition of a claim regarding the political or territorial status of Azawad.
-
D.
recognizedAsLibyaRepresentativeBy
Indicates that an entity is officially acknowledged or accepted as the legitimate representative of Libya by another specified party.
-
E.
rightsRecognizedIn
chosen
Indicates that certain rights are formally acknowledged or upheld within a specified context, such as a legal system, jurisdiction, or document.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381aaafc08190af475ef58dc16aba |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4d7ccb7ec8190a538cf279e48116e |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4d1f117708190928f92ae2611d724 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:41 a.m.