Triple

T10260211
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject This Masquerade E240574 entity
Predicate notableCoverReleaseYear P93128 FINISHED
Object 1976 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1976 | Statement: [This Masquerade, notableCoverReleaseYear, 1976]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableCoverReleaseYear
Context triple: [This Masquerade, notableCoverReleaseYear, 1976]
  • A. notableEditionYear
    Indicates the year in which a particular edition of something (such as a work, product, or publication) is considered notable or significant.
  • B. notableCoverAlbum
    Indicates that one entity is a notable album consisting primarily of cover versions of songs originally by another entity.
  • C. notableArtistRelease
    Indicates that a release (such as an album, single, or work) is created or issued by an artist who is considered notable or prominent.
  • D. notableCover
    Indicates that one entity is a particularly well-known or significant cover version or adaptation of another entity.
  • E. notableRelease
    Indicates that an entity is a significant or prominent release (such as a major version, edition, or launch) associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381a7e198819090280d5ab885d59e completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d4d2b5853081909cd0397e08a0f44d completed April 7, 2026, 9:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d4d1edae6881909a65201b8e51ea0a completed April 7, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d4d2b4ae548190b4a4c671f86b82d1 completed April 7, 2026, 9:47 a.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:32 a.m.