Triple
T1023219
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Iranian languages |
E22084
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | branch of Indo-Iranian languages |
C245
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: branch of Indo-Iranian languages Context triple: [Iranian languages, instanceOf, branch of Indo-Iranian languages]
-
A.
Indo-European language
chosen
An Indo-European language is a member of a large family of related languages spoken across Europe and parts of Asia, all descended from a common prehistoric ancestor known as Proto-Indo-European.
-
B.
Dravidian language
A Dravidian language is a member of a family of primarily South Indian and Sri Lankan languages, such as Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam, that share common historical origins and structural features distinct from Indo-European languages.
-
C.
Semitic language
A Semitic language is a member of a family of related languages originating in the Middle East and North Africa, characterized by root-based morphology and including languages such as Arabic, Hebrew, and Amharic.
-
D.
Paleo-European language
A Paleo-European language is a hypothesized pre-Indo-European language or group of languages once spoken in prehistoric Europe, known primarily through substratum influences, place names, and limited archaeological and linguistic reconstruction.
-
E.
Finnic language
A Finnic language is a member of the Uralic language family spoken primarily around the Baltic Sea region, including languages such as Finnish, Estonian, and Karelian, characterized by agglutinative morphology and vowel harmony.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493d6e380819097b384986ffc315c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.