Triple
T1021456
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | governments of Australia, New Zealand, and the United States |
E22047
|
entity |
| Predicate | allianceNature |
P9451
|
FINISHED |
| Object | defense pact |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defense pact | Statement: [governments of Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, allianceNature, defense pact]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allianceNature Context triple: [governments of Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, allianceNature, defense pact]
-
A.
hasNature
Indicates that something possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular inherent quality, essence, or fundamental type.
-
B.
alliance
Indicates a formal cooperative relationship between entities who agree to support each other in shared goals or interests.
-
C.
allianceType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of alliance relationship that exists between entities.
-
D.
allianceUse
Indicates that one party makes use of, benefits from, or leverages an alliance or allied relationship with another party.
-
E.
allianceSupport
Indicates a cooperative relationship where one party provides assistance, resources, or backing to an ally within the context of an alliance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493d6e380819097b384986ffc315c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b7dead9c8190a0f8d4ef48e6c809 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b724c7908190a5b92a57fbdbff4e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.