Triple
T1021429
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | governments of Australia, New Zealand, and the United States |
E22047
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | trilateral security partners |
C4670
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: trilateral security partners Context triple: [governments of Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, instanceOf, trilateral security partners]
-
A.
bilateral relations
Bilateral relations are the political, economic, and diplomatic interactions and agreements that occur directly between two sovereign states.
-
B.
collective defense agreement
A collective defense agreement is a formal pact among multiple states committing each to consider an attack on one member as an attack on all and to respond with coordinated defense measures.
-
C.
diplomatic relations
Diplomatic relations are the formal and informal interactions and agreements between sovereign states or international actors aimed at managing conflicts, fostering cooperation, and advancing mutual interests through negotiation and representation.
-
D.
international agreement
An international agreement is a formal, negotiated arrangement between two or more sovereign states or international organizations that creates binding obligations under international law.
-
E.
NATO military position
A NATO military position is a standardized role or appointment within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s integrated command or force structure, defining specific responsibilities, rank equivalencies, and functions across member nations’ armed forces.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493d6e380819097b384986ffc315c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.