Triple
T102124
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2004 World Series |
E2060
|
entity |
| Predicate | game3Score |
P2625
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Boston Red Sox 4–1 St. Louis Cardinals |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Boston Red Sox 4–1 St. Louis Cardinals | Statement: [2004 World Series, game3Score, Boston Red Sox 4–1 St. Louis Cardinals]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: game3Score Context triple: [2004 World Series, game3Score, Boston Red Sox 4–1 St. Louis Cardinals]
-
A.
finalScore
chosen
Indicates the resulting or overall score achieved after all contributing actions, events, or evaluations are completed.
-
B.
game1Winner
Indicates which participant or team won the first game in a series or match.
-
C.
gameWinningScoreType
Indicates the type or category of score (e.g., goal, point, run) that results in winning a game.
-
D.
decidingGameWinner
Indicates that an event, action, or process determines which participant is the winner of a game.
-
E.
gameWinningKicker
Indicates that an entity serves as the kicker responsible for securing the decisive, game-winning score in a contest.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24e0a5b7c81908d52da08c60dabc4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a258e0b11c8190b7b5cf3c354c47ce |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2563a6ff48190bec582fb2f99b7af |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:12 a.m.