Triple

T10163387
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Porcia gens E233945 entity
Predicate hasMemberHoldingOffice P16080 FINISHED
Object censor LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: censor | Statement: [Porcia gens, hasMemberHoldingOffice, censor]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMemberHoldingOffice
Context triple: [Porcia gens, hasMemberHoldingOffice, censor]
  • A. memberHoldsOffice chosen
    Indicates that a member occupies or serves in a specific official position or office within an organization or governing body.
  • B. hasMemberByVirtueOfOffice
    Indicates that an entity is a member of a group or body specifically because they hold a particular office or position.
  • C. hasListOfOfficeHolders
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a collection or record enumerating the individuals who have held a particular office or position.
  • D. hasOfficeHolderType
    Indicates that an office or position is associated with a specific type or category of office holder (e.g., elected official, appointed official).
  • E. hasPresidentialMember
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a member who holds or has held the position of president.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca848e80748190b91d1e04d35512c7 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdec6a7bb48190952f4318af9cc32b completed April 2, 2026, 4:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd4ba795808190acc9124c98c6e40f completed April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:09 p.m.