Triple
T10095029
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pahrump Valley Times |
E215843
|
entity |
| Predicate | cityServed |
P82
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pahrump |
E38161
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pahrump | Statement: [Pahrump Valley Times, cityServed, Pahrump]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pahrump Context triple: [Pahrump Valley Times, cityServed, Pahrump]
-
A.
Pahrump, Nevada
chosen
Pahrump, Nevada is a small desert town in Nye County known as a gateway community to Death Valley National Park and the surrounding Mojave Desert region.
-
B.
Tonopah
Tonopah is a historic mining town in central Nevada that serves as the county seat of Nye County.
-
C.
Elko
Elko is a small city in northeastern Nevada known as a regional hub for ranching, mining, and outdoor recreation.
-
D.
Caliente, Nevada
Caliente, Nevada is a small historic railroad town in southeastern Nevada known for its hot springs and role as the primary community in rural Lincoln County.
-
E.
Wellington, Nevada
Wellington, Nevada is a small unincorporated rural community in western Nevada known for ranching, agriculture, and its scenic location near the Sierra Nevada foothills.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83a4947c8190823a7495dc5d96ed |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdd0784c288190967d143beca32c4b |
completed | April 2, 2026, 2:12 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d8dbe24a64819098bc94a8a62cc46b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:15 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:02 p.m.