Triple
T10092350
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constanța County |
E215372
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Medgidia |
E269157
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Medgidia | Statement: [Constanța County, contains, Medgidia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Medgidia Context triple: [Constanța County, contains, Medgidia]
-
A.
Medgidia
chosen
Medgidia is a city in southeastern Romania, situated in the historical region of Dobruja and known as an important local industrial and transportation hub.
-
B.
Shpola
Shpola is a small town in central Ukraine that serves as an administrative center within Cherkasy Oblast.
-
C.
Monastyryshche
Monastyryshche is a small town in central Ukraine that serves as a local administrative and cultural center within Cherkasy Oblast.
-
D.
Ruciane-Nida
Ruciane-Nida is a small town and popular lakeside tourist resort in northeastern Poland, known for its location amid the forests and lakes of the Masurian Lake District.
-
E.
Nové Hrady
Nové Hrady is a historic town in the Czech Republic known for its well-preserved castle and location near the Austrian border in the South Bohemian Region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83a1eed081908b2e9580f2ebeea7 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdd05c3c0c8190927580717429a4e5 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 2:11 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d3174109988190b703bb5b7c89c5c2 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 2:15 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:01 p.m.