Triple
T1008039
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Japan Trench |
E21757
|
entity |
| Predicate | plateBoundaryType |
P23556
|
FINISHED |
| Object | oceanic-oceanic convergence |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: oceanic-oceanic convergence | Statement: [Japan Trench, plateBoundaryType, oceanic-oceanic convergence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: plateBoundaryType Context triple: [Japan Trench, plateBoundaryType, oceanic-oceanic convergence]
-
A.
plateBoundaryBetween
Indicates a geological relationship where a boundary exists between two tectonic plates.
-
B.
plateBoundaryTypeWithCocosPlate
Indicates the type of tectonic plate boundary involving the Cocos Plate in a given plate interaction.
-
C.
plateBoundaryTypeWithPacificPlate
Indicates the type of tectonic plate boundary associated with the Pacific Plate in a given plate-boundary relationship.
-
D.
boundaryTypeWithNazcaPlate
Indicates the type of tectonic plate boundary that exists between the referenced entity and the Nazca Plate.
-
E.
plateBoundaryComplexity
Indicates the degree of irregularity or intricacy in the shape, arrangement, and interactions of tectonic plate boundaries.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493c53e648190ae8cb76c433fd9a7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b7f4c66c8190b6098fb72c1465a3 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b7203124819091de68cba5f731c1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4b7f2d1b081908eb2df54e91c8c1d |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.