Triple
T10055102
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Western Oklahoma |
E208839
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCounty |
P285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Beaver County |
E301076
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Beaver County | Statement: [Western Oklahoma, hasCounty, Beaver County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Beaver County Context triple: [Western Oklahoma, hasCounty, Beaver County]
-
A.
Beaver County
Beaver County is a county in western Pennsylvania that forms part of the greater Pittsburgh metropolitan area.
-
B.
Beaver County
Beaver County is a rural county in southwestern Utah known for its mountainous terrain, outdoor recreation, and the county seat of Beaver.
-
C.
Beaver County
chosen
Beaver County is a sparsely populated county in the Oklahoma Panhandle known for its agricultural economy and wide-open High Plains landscape.
-
D.
Park County
Park County is a rural county in southwestern Montana known for its proximity to Yellowstone National Park and its scenic mountain landscapes.
-
E.
Adams County
Adams County is a rural county in central Wisconsin known for its forests, lakes, and outdoor recreation.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca836094408190a36a1ea7e9a86fcd |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdcfacacd08190abe66f8bb17b92c7 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 2:08 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d29a49cb208190b56d991a523efbac |
completed | April 5, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:57 p.m.