Triple
T10040207
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Handwritten |
E205274
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasReviewConsensus |
P66549
|
FINISHED |
| Object | received generally positive reviews from music critics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: received generally positive reviews from music critics | Statement: [Handwritten, hasReviewConsensus, received generally positive reviews from music critics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReviewConsensus Context triple: [Handwritten, hasReviewConsensus, received generally positive reviews from music critics]
-
A.
hasRecension
Indicates that one textual version or edition is a revised or alternative form of another text.
-
B.
reviewedBy
Indicates that an item, work, or action has been examined and evaluated by a specific agent or reviewer.
-
C.
hasReviewReception
chosen
Indicates that an entity has received a critical or evaluative review describing how it was received or perceived.
-
D.
areReviewedEvery
Indicates that one entity conducts reviews of another entity at every specified time interval or on every relevant occasion.
-
E.
hasHighRatingOn
Indicates that one entity is evaluated or reviewed on another entity’s platform or system with a rating that meets or exceeds a defined high threshold.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca834f70e88190b2d74828b7767ec1 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdcee186708190bc9fecd637b4f7e6 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 2:05 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4b8638508190b22acc65500ec7d6 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:55 p.m.