Triple
T10023840
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Louise Brown |
E200675
|
entity |
| Predicate | conceptionMethod |
P16675
|
FINISHED |
| Object | in vitro fertilization |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: in vitro fertilization | Statement: [Louise Brown, conceptionMethod, in vitro fertilization]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conceptionMethod Context triple: [Louise Brown, conceptionMethod, in vitro fertilization]
-
A.
conceptionBy
Indicates that one entity is conceived or brought into existence by another entity.
-
B.
sexControlTechnique
Indicates a technique or method used to influence, determine, or manipulate the sex of organisms or offspring.
-
C.
conceivedWhile
Indicates that one entity was conceived during the time period in which another specified condition, event, or circumstance was occurring.
-
D.
reproductiveCare
Indicates the provision or receipt of services, support, or actions related to an entity’s reproductive health and reproductive processes.
-
E.
fertilizationType
chosen
Indicates the method or process by which fertilization occurs or is achieved between reproductive cells.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca831c45f08190ac1505cc15076608 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdcd7c75548190aa604d90d63dc111 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 1:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4b7cd4208190b2253583ee2f892c |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:53 p.m.